This post is a catchup on social media discussions.
Feel free to disregard if you haven't followed it!
Calling racial preferences inherently racist as I did is an overstatement. I recant.
And yet.
Those ethnic
or racial preferences within us are not justified by their natural existence,
much less are they obligated by Scripture or natural law.
They
are like any natural impulse or temptation, which must be disciplined by
the Word. When I hear “God Bless the USA,”
I can agree and even get emotional, but I need to temper it with “God may judge
the USA, instead.”
When we
say grace perfects nature, we mean exactly this. Natural affection
needs sanctifying, not celebrating or justifying without qualification, just
because the Left vilifies whites or America, or just because we feel it well up
in us naturally. C.S. Lewis, in The Four
Loves, on Storge, is excellent on this.
(To
clarify, I have no qualms about tearing up watching a Trump rally where Lee
Greenwood sings, “God bless the USA.”)
So
equating natural affection for one's own tribe or race with the fifth
commandment obligation to honor our fathers seems a mistake to me. I shouldn’t come to hate my country and its
founders. But neither should I adore it without qualification, without some
theological lenses on, evaluating that nationalism.
One of you defined racism as “the belief, explicit or
implicit, that one race is born morally superior to another race. It creates
arrogance and pride in one group while also lowering the other group, sometimes
to sub-human status.” That is hard
racism, but there are lower-grade versions that are not the woke-white-guilt
variety. I would add that Kinism asserts
some level of principled segregation or preference for one’s own ethnicity,
with NO inherent animosity or belief of superiority toward other races. (Though some strands of it are undoubtedly
white supremacist.) This is a view I
believe should be soundly rejected by church leadership. I stand by Uri’s post.
When Uri says “chased out of the church,” realize that we do
this all the time with other issues: “We’ll have no talk of women in leadership
here.” “You want to blow up abortion
clinics? You are NOT welcome here.” I’ve had to do this once or twice at church, in
my years of ministry. All the talk charging
that I want to excommunicate people with different social theories, or throw
out discipline procedure, is uncharitable to my and Uri’s position. The question is simply where the Overton
window is. I’m deeply concerned that it
has shifted recently in our circles, toward allowing and justifying ethnic
preferences, in reaction to the immigration crisis and leftist reverse discrimination
for minorities, which we now face, and should oppose. However.
Whatever happened to judging people by the content of their
character, instead of the color of their skin?
That is a sound Scriptural principle, regardless how some may want to ad
hominem attack the man who said it.
Right now the church I serve has no minorities
attending. That is not a problem to fix,
out of some white guilt. I am not virtue
signaling like the leftists, as I’ve been accused of. But if the Asian or black visitors who come
are made to feel awkward or excluded by things we say about this, that IS a
problem.
More on preferences.
Yes, as of now I prefer that my single daughter marry a
nice, white, Dutch Reformed boy. The
controversy isn’t over that abstract preference, but over what you will do when
she brings home a black or Latino boy instead.
If he’s a gangster in lifestyle, we all agree on urging her back to a
Christian way of life, and leaving him. But
if he’s a Clarence Thomas type, it seems we don’t agree. Maybe I’m wrong. My preference then needs to give way to
God’s providence. I don’t dig in
and say my preference is based in the natural order, and God forbids or at
least frowns on such a union, because He set the boundaries of nations,
etc. If it’s a problem that a black or
Asian settles in to a white, Dutch Reformed church, or that a Moabite convert
to Yahweh marries a faithful Israelite, or that a Hittite soldier becomes one
of David’s mighty men, I define that as unbiblical Kinism, which should be (r)ejected
from the church.
No comments:
Post a Comment