6.26.2020

An Exhortation

Briefly, I just want to encourage you to make sure you are giving prayerful time and attention to your Bibles and your families.  In these tumultuous days, the news feeds, and opinion pieces can be addictively consuming, and our impact in those areas is relatively low.  Put your energy where you can make a difference:
 - your own soul in personal devotions;
 - your spouse, as married folks;
 - your children, as parents;
 - your siblings and friends, as young people

Work on building a positive, faithful Christian outlook in your home and among your friends, more than we analyze and criticize a society going haywire.  Sing together!  Pray together.  Cultivate edifying conversation.

I'm not saying we should stick our heads in the sand, culture-engagement-wise.  We want to know what is going on, to prepare ourselves and our children mentally and spiritually for the kinds of attacks we will face.  But we fight hostility with joy.  We fight an embrace of wickedness with love of righteousness.  The main thing is not to defeat a liberal agenda in CHAZ/CHOP or an anti-Biblical agenda in Lansing or DC, though that is an end goal.  The main thing is to remain faithful in our lives, families, schools, and churches first.


May God us the grace to hear His Word, and conform our lives fully to it.

6.25.2020

A Republic, If You Can Keep It - Neil Gorsuch review

A Republic, If You Can Keep ItA Republic, If You Can Keep It by Neil Gorsuch

My rating: 4 of 5 stars


As an anthology of the Supreme Court justice’s speeches and rulings, if you want to get inside the head of one of the SCOTUS nine, this is a great way to go.

Gorsuch recognizes the great blessing we have in our nation, in the rule of law. He capably shows the layman why this is and how it works in the legal profession. Defending originalism (the original meaning in historical context should inform our reading of the law) and textualism (go by what the grammar actually says, not by an policy outcome/ruling that you want), I cheered throughout at the spirit of Antonin Scalia that shone out.

Humorous personal anecdotes aside, it was a bit of a slog through the specific rulings. More an education than a conservative anthem, I had to work to finish it.

One of Gorsuch’s main points is that judges ought not be politicized. It isn’t as simple as 5 conservative and 4 liberal justices. Reading and ruling on the law is seldom a political exercise, and shouldn’t be. We assume that real political consequences from legal decisions must mean the rulings were politically motivated, and they aren’t, or shouldn’t be. While I take his point, and grow frustrated with political commentators who treat the court like it’s another representative body with a left or right majority, what Gorsuch misses is that one’s understanding of virtue, ethics and law must be informed by the queen of the sciences, theology. Your view of God and how you know the truth will drastically shape your view of the law. Gorsuch either doesn’t want to talk about that, to keep a broader audience (I hope), or he consciously denies the connection (more worrisome).

I was almost done with the book when SCOTUS’ Bostock ruling of June 2020 came out, in which Gorsuch wrote the ruling, re-defining the prohibition of sex discrimination to include trans-gender individuals. The author went against much of the good he wrote in this book. He did the very thing he argued against: writing and redefining law for a desired outcome, instead of modestly applying what is there, regardless where it leads.

It seems solid judges are susceptible to liberal influence when they are seated on the court. It has happened several times before. The real virtues of collegiality and being open to consider opposing views, are often distorted into compromise of principle. This leads to grave harm and injustice done – to millions of unborn aborted babies with Roe, to the institution of marriage with Obergefell, and now to all of us who must legally deny the obvious natural gender God has given every person. Very sad.



View all my reviews

War of the Worlds - A Review

The War of the WorldsThe War of the Worlds by H.G. Wells

My rating: 3 of 5 stars


I read this out loud to the family in the last couple months, as our youngest hadn’t read it yet. I thought of it near the beginning of pandemic lockdown, because of the virus connection!

A convinced Darwinian, Wells rivets one page and languishes the next, ending with uncertainty about man’s fate in a new technological world.


The riveting element

You know what’s coming, but Wells’ pacing is so careful. It’s psychologically brilliant. The book is really about the human response of fear and shock to trauma and change. The Martians are mentioned fairly infrequently, but the danger looms constantly.


The languishing element

Having read this 8 years ago, I’d forgotten how many local place names the author includes. It’s almost encyclopedic, a la Hugo about Paris, or Melville about whales. I think to the original reader familiar with his locale, this added to the riveting quality. It’s like seeing the small town next door in the national newspaper, like I saw just yesterday. God Himself uses this literary device in the prophets, when warning Israel of the coming military invasion (Isaiah 10:28-32). But when you don’t know any of those places it loses the emotional affect, and you have to mentally understand the message: “this is real – it’s just 4 blocks from where you’re sitting. 3 blocks. 2 blocks…”


Darwin’s natural selection

Besides the “man is an animal” view, Wells also depicts religion as mentally weak and inferior. The main character does wind up praying, and the less astute might see this as a partial vindication of theism. But Wells is actually trying to say that human strength, found in reason, can be broken and resort to pitiful prayer, given enough trauma. Man may be naturally selected out of existence.


Conclusion

Wells’ outlook fascinates. Most of his writings are infused with bold confidence in man’s progressing evolution. But he also lets the dark underside emerge: what if there are terrors too big for us to handle? What if progress takes us someplace we don’t want to go? He ends with less confidence in the human modern project, building a bridge toward current post-modern thought, even though that was decades away.



View all my reviews

6.19.2020

We Are All Greta, Now





[A 2 second video of Greta at the U.N. - I can't get it to play automatically...]


When Greta Thunberg scolded the world over climate change, the adults in the room hung their heads, meekly nodded, and promised to do better.

The rest of the world’s rising generations have taken note.  They have learned from Greta.
What have they learned?

To advance your agenda, you need not persuade rationally, anymore.  Just berate and condemn until the establishment feels guilty.  That will do the job just as well, and it’s a lot easier.

HOW DARE YOU?

How dare you not wear a mask?
How dare you question systemic racism?
How dare you use force against rioters, or those resisting arrest?
How dare you wonder if LGBTQ folks should have Title 7/9 rights?

Each of these is worthy of discussion.  But we aren’t getting much discussion.  We are being manipulated by an aggressive one-two rhetorical punch, to doubt our views, to stay silent when we have questions, and to go along to keep our jobs and our reputations.  We are being threatened with being “outed” for having unacceptable views, for which most will ostracize us.

What's the one-two punch?
Punch one: be angry and emotional about something.
Punch two: amp it up when others question your assertion by claiming others are telling you how to feel, that you don't have a safe space for your voice, that you're being denied your experience.

This is deadly to free speech.  We must give others the right to voice views we find reprehensible, or we are no longer a free society.  This is what sets us apart from Communism, but we are becoming more like them every week.

It’s quite ironic.  The very Left that for decades has criticized conservatives and Christians for being intolerant, has become extremely intolerant itself.  Maybe it always was but the mask is off, now, pun intended.  They are literally protesting as harmful (and walking out on) opposing opinions even being voiced or published.

We are using condemnation as a weapon to make others feel guilty, which IS the new persuasion.

How is a Christian to respond?  I'll save that for my next post.

6.18.2020

Samuel Summary - end

Chapter 24
David doesn't kill Saul when he has a chance, and points it out to Saul.
Saul responds well verbally, even saying David will be the next king, and asking his mercy.
Future events in chapter 26 show his hypocrisy, though.

25
David is spurned by Nabal, whose flocks David's men protected.  David plans a disproportionate response, but Nabal's wife Abigail intervenes, giving what David asked for, and speaking wisely to dissuade David.  Nabal dies soon after, and David proposes to Abigail.  He now has 3 wives: Michal, Abigail, and Ahinoam.

26
Chapter 24 repeats, but David is more pro-active in making it happen, and makes a stronger appeal.  Saul has less to say, and is in a weaker position than before.  David continues to be tempted to unnecessary violence by his own men.

27
David goes to Philistine territory to live, pretending to them that he is opposed to and attacking Israel.

28
The Philistines gather to attack Israel.  Saul out of fear goes to a witch for guidance, since God doesn't answer him.  Samuel says he'll be dead in a day, and Israel defeated.  Saul eats an anti-Passover with unleavened bread, before Israel's defeat (not deliverance), as Israel's unfaithful leader Moses.

29
The Philistines don't let David go into battle with them, afraid he might turn on them, which he probably would have.  David wisely protests to Achish, else it'd look suspicious, then goes home.

30
But his home was raided, and all the people and goods carried off.  David pursues after seeking God's blessing, and recovers it all.  He shows wisdom in ruling, unlike Saul.

31
The Philistines attack, win, and kill Saul and his 3 oldest sons, including Jonathan.

6.17.2020

Samuel Summary - 3

Chapter 16
David is anointed king, though he is the youngest, least impressive son of Jesse

17
David defeats the Philistine champion Goliath, though opposed by Saul and his brothers.

18
David befriends Saul's son Jonathan, and marries his daughter Michal, but remains at odds with Saul.

19
David keeps defeating Philistines, but Saul stays jealous with him, and tries to kill him.

20
Jonathan and David separate over Saul's enmity to David.

21
David leaves Israel, with holy bread for the journey.  Escapes from Gath.

22
While David hangs out and gathers forces with those opposed to Saul, Saul kills priests unjustly, who had helped David without knowing it was against Saul's wishes.

23
David escapes from Saul, with God's help


6.16.2020

Samuel Summary - 2

Chapter 9
God leads Saul to meet Samuel.

10
Samuel anoints Saul.  Saul hides it from his family.
Samuel makes it public.  Some don't find him impressive, but Saul doesn't push it.

11
Saul succeeds in gathering Israel to fight and defeat the Ammonites.

12
Samuel departs public life with a stern warning to follow Yahweh.

13
Saul offers sacrifice instead of waiting for Samuel.  Samuel promises to replace him as king.

14
Jonathan successfully fight the Philistines while Saul hinders Israel.

15
Saul doesn't destroy Amalek as God says, yet clings to his reputation and honor.

6.15.2020

Thoughts on 1 Samuel - 1

I've started a sermon series on 1 Samuel, and these are brief thoughts  on reading it afresh.

Chapter 1
Hannah was misunderstood by her husband and her priest, yet her response was to worship, pray, and sacrifice. 

2
She actually puts her 3 year old son in the care of the priest who thought she was drunk when she was praying!  And I’m sure she knew about his sons’ wickedness, too.  They took more than God allowed in His law from the peoples’ sacrifices for themselves (2:15-16), and they fornicated with women serving in the tabernacle (2:22).

Faithful Samuel is set against Eli’s corrupt sons.
God has ways of correcting corruption in places of power and privilege.

3
We can be so slow to hear God speaking to us.  He is patient.

4
It seems clear that Eli’s sons Hophni and Phineas were in charge, not Eli.  In vs 13 he is trembling for the ark – I don’t think he wanted it to go out to the battle, but he was overridden by his sons or the military leaders.  This is a sign of a corrupt nation, when the voice of the elderly or the man of God is shouted down by those clamoring for victory or whatever their personal agenda.

Eli’s level of guilt is often discussed.  3:13 is key: Eli did not rebuke/restrain them.  He did rebuke them, so the fact that God rebukes Eli must mean that he did not do as much as he could have to stop their wickedness.

Ichabod means “no glory.”  There is a level of blessing from God on a society that one can sense, and Phinehas’ wife noticed it was gone.  I’m having that same sense now, during the pandemic and riots of 2020, in the United States of America.  I approve of most of what President Trump has done (not said), but the desire to make us great without turning to Him in repentance is wrong headed.

5-6
God deals with His enemies Himself, when His people cannot.

7
Victory at last, after repenting and turning back to God

8
Samuel's sons are replaced, as Adam's, Abraham's, Isaac's, Jacob's, and Moses' were.
And as Saul's will be.
Verse 15: the government is going to take 10% of your income in taxes!  What a travesty!
Israel thought they needed a form of government like the nations around to protect and provide for them, forgetting the Lord could do this as He saw fit.

Tell It Slant

Emily Dickinson:

Tell all the truth but tell it slant —
Success in Circuit lies
Too bright for our infirm Delight
The Truth's superb surprise
As Lightning to the Children eased
With explanation kind
The Truth must dazzle gradually
Or every man be blind —

6.06.2020

Land of Hope and Glory

I'm listening to Elgar's Pomp and Circumstance, prepping for a graduation party here!
I decided to look up the words - "Land of Hope and Glory"

Land of hope and glory, mother of the free
How shall we extol thee, who are born of thee?
Wider still and wider shall thy bounds be set
God, who made thee mighty, make thee mightier yet
God, who made thee mighty, make thee mightier yet
Land of hope and glory, mother of the free
How shall we extol thee, who are born of thee?
Wider still and wider shall thy bounds be set
God, who made thee mighty, make thee mightier yet
God, who made thee mighty, make thee mightier yet


Except for the bit of expansionism in there, that's decent patriotism.
I found myself this morning singing this one, too.

God bless America, land that I love
Stand beside her and guide her
Through the night with the light from above
From the mountains to the prairies
To the oceans white with foam
God bless America, my home sweet home
God bless America, land that I love
Stand beside her and guide her
Through the night with the light from above
From the mountains to the prairies
To the oceans white with foam
God bless America, my home sweet home
From the mountains to the prairies
To the oceans white with foam
God bless America, my home sweet home
God bless America, my home sweet home


What a vastly different sentiment than is out there right now...

6.04.2020

On Riots and Racism

Context
This is a response to some Facebook discussion with friends, made a bit more general so it's mostly understandable to all.


Personal posture in approaching this topic
In Psalm 139:23 David prays, “Search me, O God and know my heart, try me and know my thoughts!  And see if there be any wicked way in me.”  Just as Jesus extends the application of the law to the nooks and crannies of the human heart in the sermon on the mount, so we should sincerely search out unseen sinful patterns in our lives.  So I’m fine with people pressing and questioning others to consider if they have some racist impulses they didn’t realize, or if the society around them does.  Usually, this is taken too far, though, and the assumption is asserted strongly that most of the country IS racist when it isn’t true.  The same David who asked God to search his heart, could also rightly declare his innocence of specific accusations being brought against him, to push another agenda (Psalm 7).  That’s what is happening in our country right now.

Second, when the African American community is hurting and grieving, as they now truly are, it is important to weep with those who weep, and to love our neighbor.  There are times love looks like Job’s friends coming and sitting with him in silence for a week.  There are other times love offers a challenging word, iron sharpening iron.  Sometimes when we are in pain, the wound is partly self-inflicted, we blame others and we lash out wrongly.  I believe that is true of the African-Amercian community right now. 

To analyze the situation as I see it is not to explain it AWAY, like I want the problem or the people to stop bothering my comfortable life.  Nor am I trying to tell people how to feel, although that’s not always a bad thing (Nehemiah 8:9-12; Philippians 4:4; 1 Thessalonians 5:18; Romans 12:15).  It seems inconsistent somehow to get rebuked for not showing enough compassion for black voices, and then told not to tell someone how to feel.  Well, you just told ME how to feel.  This is an example of injustices increasingly done to the supposed "privileged," to equalize things.  It's French-Revolution-dangerous.  As one riot went by a fraternity, the white guy inside gave them a thumbs up indicating he was on their side.  Five seconds later a rock smashed through his window.  You may respond, and say, "Now the shoe's on the other foot, isn't it?  Now you know how it feels to be black in America!"  See the end of this post on veneance, or just read Romans 12:17.

Anyway, I write to think through things, hopefully to improve things.  Not to white-splain away black pain.  Sheesh.  This is an attempt to love my neighbor.  Why can I not be believed in that?


Multi-culturalism
25 years ago when I was in school and just graduated, the Left was pushing multi-culturalism.  What is good and true about it - that each culture has much that should be celebrated - was used to advance a more sinister agenda: the values in any given culture are morally relative, since they evolve differently for different people.  Also that we need to equalize the value of all cultures, meaning the majority Western culture in the West has to be taken down several notches as we celebrate other cultures.  This argument basically won the day, and our current identity politics and the false narrative of the 1619 Project is built on it.  Now we say “let me speak my truth,” “don’t let me lose my black voice.”  We see ourselves more as members of an ethnic tribe, than as individuals or citizens of a nation.  For centuries the Left has emphasized the corporate aspect of society, and the Right asserts the individual, so this controversy is nothing new.  Both are needed in their proper place.  But we need to reject identifying ourselves and others primarily as members of a given tribe, or even as a slave.  God doesn’t let us do that:

“Do not lie to one another, seeing that you have put off the old self with its practices 10 and have put on the new self, which is being renewed in knowledge after the image of its creator. 11 Here there is not Greek and Jew, circumcised and uncircumcised, barbarian, Scythian, slave, free; but Christ is all, and in all.” (Colossians 3:9-11)

Pride in your country and culture is okay in its place, but it needs to stay subservient to Christ.


What is justice?
There is a reason lady justice is blind as she holds up the scales.  Truth doesn’t change based on who is speaking and what their skin color is.  MLK had a dream of a color blind society, but those who claim his flag today have changed the dream drastically.  Now, if you’re white, you have privilege and have to sit down and shut up.  I’m all for listening to the voice of the marginalized, and truly giving justice to the oppressed.  But that doesn’t mean silencing others, or accusing them of silencing the oppressed when they “speak their truth.”  It doesn’t mean reparations generations later, it means doing justice to each individual regardless of race, without partiality for the police or the rich, OR for the poor.  “You shall do no injustice in court. You shall not be partial to the poor or defer to the great, but in righteousness shall you judge your neighbor” (Leviticus 19:15).  

Most importantly, justice doesn’t mean we should expect racism and police brutality to never happen, but we should expect it to be punished when it does.  We have changed our laws and our ways much for the better in the last 50 years regarding this, though we are far from perfect in executing it, as the Arbery case in Georgia showed.  In George Floyd’s case, justice is being served.  The system is working.  It is not endemically racist.  Are there bad cops and corrupt judges?  Yes.  An inherently racist society?  No.


Softer, Subtler Racism?
Now, there is an expanded definition of racism being argued for these days.  “Maybe you don’t attack or discriminate against black people overtly, but you are more suspicious when one walks past your house.”  This gets tricky.  I believe one can avoid racism while also having their guard up more in that situation.  Controversial, I know.  Let me explain.  

(I live out in the country, in a suburb with large-size lots, in a county with a .4% African American population.  NOT the city!  So this scenario might not make sense to some.)  

If a young woman walks up to my house, stops and just looks for 30 seconds, my threat level is around 2 out of 10.  If a young man does that, it shoots up to 7.  If it’s a young black man, it’s maybe an 8.  I freely admit this, knowing how politically incorrect it is, but it’s NOT necessarily because I’m racist.  It’s because of the historical data and statistics of who commits the most violent crimes.  Is that expectation sexist or racist, or does it just take history into account?  

I DO believe everyone (especially the police) needs to work against that expectation, and give the benefit of the doubt to folks.  Police and everyone need to judge people by their behavior, not their skin color.  This is where soft racism can be a real thing.  What happened to Ahmaud Arbery was appalling. But it’s news because it happens so rarely, not because it happens all the time.  Protests like in my town today, based on the assumption that it DOES happen all the time are not grounded in the facts.  Having your guard up when a young man walks by is NOT inherently a lesser-grade racist sin of the same kind as chasing him down to apprehend and shoot him (the system is working to do justice in that case, too).  Some seem to think that one third to half of the country looked on in silent approval of what happened to Floyd and Arbery.  At least all the Trump supporters, I’m sure!  That’s really out of touch with reality.

I can take the exhortation to heart, though, to notice and help, when people aren’t as socialized or equipped as me to operate well in society, given their background.  But that’s a family heritage problem as much as it is a racial one.  (JD Vance’s Hillbilly Elegy really helped me understand the “underclass” mentality, white or black.)  It puts me in mind of greater men than me, like Clarence Thomas and others who were disadvantaged societally, endured racism and poverty as a child, but took personal responsibility to overcome it and succeed.  

So I’m not going to feel guilty personally when I see a poor or homeless black man at the DMV.  That is the fake “white guilt” of the woke.  I find it toxic and unjust.  I DO though have a calling to love my neighbor, and I may be better equipped to help him after listening to this conversation.


My town and mayor
I live in a small town an hour from Detroit.  We have a history of some Ku Klux Klan activity and sympathy nearby, 50-100 years ago.  Malcolm X’s home was vandalized when he was a child as the police looked on, about 45 minutes from where I sit.  Last week there was an isolated empty threat that people were going to come and burn the town in protest.  I was in an online meeting with our mayor, and his response was interesting.  To paraphrase: “I have not observed racism in our town, and we aren’t like that.  There will always be a few idiots out there, but let’s be vigilant and good to each other.”  That is a MUCH better response than apologizing for being racist in response to pressure from mobs, when the truth of the charge is dicey at best.  We have protests planned at our courthouse this afternoon.


Conclusion
The big picture here is that two wrongs never make a right.

“Repay no one evil for evil, but give thought to do what is honorable in the sight of all. If possible, so far as it depends on you, live peaceably with all. Beloved, never avenge yourselves” (Romans 12:17-19).

We shouldn’t fight injustice against African-Americans with another injustice: throwing out wild accusations or assumptions that people are racist, when we don’t know that.  Or expanding the definition to the point that I’m guilty just for being white.  If it’s wrong to get pulled over for “driving black,” it is also wrong to be accused as one of the 'privileged' of not being concerned enough about racism.

We shouldn’t fight the injustice of suppressing minorities’ voices by curtailing free speech for all, as is happening with college campus speech codes.  Criticism of a black person’s ideas is not silencing their voice or dismissing them, out of racism.

We shouldn’t fight wealth inequity by sacrificing justice: soaking the rich to give to the poor as we do in our tax policy.  

And we certainly shouldn’t fight the injustice done to Floyd and others with the injustice of destroying homes, looting businesses, and running over policemen.


May God have mercy on our nation, to show us our sins, and to restrain the wickedness in our hearts.

6.02.2020

In the Face of Injustice, Work and Produce

Things I Never Noticed in the Bible

The parable of the talents is well known.  Jesus tells it, we assume, to call us to steward our resources wisely for Him until He returns and gives us the "well done, good and faithful servant."

What's less known is the context of the parable in Luke's account (19:11-14).

"As they heard these things, he proceeded to tell a parable, because he was near to Jerusalem, and because they supposed that the kingdom of God was to appear immediately. 12 He said therefore, “A nobleman went into a far country to receive for himself a kingdom and then return. 13 Calling ten of his servants, he gave them ten minas, and said to them, ‘Engage in business until I come.’ 14 But his citizens hated him and sent a delegation after him, saying, ‘We do not want this man to reign over us.’ "

Herod the Great actually did this, going to Rome to ask Caesar for kingship of Judea.  The Jews sent a delegation after him to appeal to Caesar NOT to give it to him, but Caesar did, anyway.  Herod was brutal, crucifying 6,000 Jews at one time for their violent protest against his putting a Roman image in their temple.

I'd known that before, but didn't realize until reading it today the enormous difference it makes in the purpose of the parable.  And it's right there in the text, highlighted above.


Jesus actually tells this parable to warn his hearers against contributing to an uprising against Herod to place Him on the throne in Herod's place.  They should instead focus on doing their work well so as to help prosper their society and nation, regardless of the injustices in it.


I don't think our usual reading of the parable is wrong.  I actually dissent from the mainstream Christian theologian's view that Jesus' parables have only one meaning.  They say that to avoid speculating on the peripheral details in the parables, which is wise.  But the parables are richer than just making one point.

Here, Jesus is saying BOTH:
  • that we need to steward our resources well for Him, and He will reward us at the last day.
  • AND, that people need to not force the arrival of utopia by violence against unjust rulers.
NO, Jesus says, be productive and work to multiply resources, even when you live under a brutal, harsh, and unjust regime like Herod's.



This is a message badly needed in our cultural moment - the pandemic, police brutality, and riots of 2020.

People.  

Please.  

Go back to work.  

Find more constructive ways to protest and work against evil.

6.01.2020

Coronavirus and Christ

Coronavirus and ChristCoronavirus and Christ by John Piper

My rating: 5 of 5 stars


A rare 5 stars.

John Piper knows about fatal disease first hand. He knows the Bible inside and out, and believes it with conviction, when it speaks of God’s sovereignty in such disease.

While Piper gives specific answers to what God may be doing in this pandemic, he first wisely does two things. First, he sets a solid foundation that God has spoken to us reliably in the Bible. He then uses Scripture throughout to back up each point. Second, he wisely avoids getting into the medical and political morass of conflicting opinions on CDC guidelines, civil restrictions, etc. This may be because he published this quite early in the lockdown, before the curve was flattened and it became controversial. Still, where he could have weighed in on the health side, he focused on his theological lane, and the result is gold. It also matters less when he wrote it (when we didn’t know much about the virus!).

Giving six possible answers to what God may be doing in this, one thing I appreciated was this. Piper does not stay silent on the possibility that this may be God’s judgment on some for their sins. This was such an obvious answer in generations past. But in our “woke” culture, most people, even in the conservative evangelical church, want to avoid actually saying it, even if they reluctantly believe it themselves when shown the verses.

But I also appreciate Piper’s balance. Some would over-react and focus only on what the culture (or the church culture) is getting wrong, but he instead delivers up a well-rounded response. It’s a warning, a pointer to Christ’s return at the end of the world, and more.

Get this book for free, here.

https://www.abwe.org/coronavirus-and-...



View all my reviews