A fairly convincing treatment of Matthew 24, and Revelation 20, with an eye to asserting the post-millennial view. He is 95% convincing of the preterist part of this, especially that Jesus was referring to Jerusalem's fall in 70AD in Matthew 24, up until verse 35. He is less convincing regarding Revelation 20 and post-millennialism in general. While many of the arguments are good (first resurrection in Rev 20 is one's regeneration; Satan bound at Christ's first coming) they do not make a conclusive case for post-millennialism.
9.12.2010
Victory in Jesus
A fairly convincing treatment of Matthew 24, and Revelation 20, with an eye to asserting the post-millennial view. He is 95% convincing of the preterist part of this, especially that Jesus was referring to Jerusalem's fall in 70AD in Matthew 24, up until verse 35. He is less convincing regarding Revelation 20 and post-millennialism in general. While many of the arguments are good (first resurrection in Rev 20 is one's regeneration; Satan bound at Christ's first coming) they do not make a conclusive case for post-millennialism.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment